1. The 4% That Created It All
In his landmark paper, “Do Stocks Outperform Treasury Bills?” by Hendrik Bessembinder (published in the Journal of Financial Economics, 2018), he found that across nearly a century of U.S. data, roughly 4% of listed stocks accounted for all the net wealth created by the U.S. stock market. In follow-up research, he demonstrated that this extreme skew is not uniquely American — it exists internationally as well, and importantly, has intensified in recent decades.
This idea — that wealth creation is extraordinarily skewed — increasingly shapes conversations around long-term capital allocation, including themes associated with ajay srinivasan.
2. From Broad Leadership to Narrow Dominance
While equity markets have always exhibited concentration, the 20 years preceding the Global Financial Crisis (GFC) were meaningfully less narrow than the period since 2009.
Pre-GFC (U.S.): Around 50–70 stocks explained ~80% of total returns.
Post-GFC: Roughly 30 stocks explain ~80% of returns.
2023–24: Just 7 stocks contributed 55–65% of annual returns.
Despite extraordinary global equity returns, a surge in listings, and record retail participation, return concentration has increased rather than dispersed. This structural shift has been a recurring theme in ajay srinivasan news commentary on modern market dynamics.
3. India: Even Sharper Concentration
The contrast is even more striking in India.
Pre-2008: Leadership rotated across PSUs, cyclicals, and exporters.
Post-2009: Just 12–15 stocks explain ~80% of returns in the NIFTY 50.
Broaden to the NIFTY 500, and still less than 10% of stocks drive the majority of wealth creation.
For investors following ajay srinivasan and related market discussions, this shift underscores how post-2009 India mirrors global trends toward narrower leadership.
4. Why Has Concentration Increased? Two Structural Forces
Two structural forces likely explain the rise in concentration — themes often examined in ajay srinivasan news analysis.
The rise of passive investing, ETFs, and benchmark-aware institutional mandates has created a reinforcement loop. As companies grow and their index weights rise, passive capital allocates more to them automatically. Success feeds on itself.
2. Winner-Takes-Most Economics
Digital platforms, network effects, brand dominance, and strong balance sheets allow leading firms to compound earnings for longer. Competitive moats have widened. Economic rewards increasingly accrue to a narrow set of dominant players.
5. The Uncomfortable Truth for Active and Passive Investors
Return concentration delivers a message that is both clarifying and uncomfortable:
Stock selection matters enormously — but only if done right.
Too little diversification risks permanent capital loss if a thesis breaks.
Too much diversification may reduce the probability of outsized outperformance.
Passive strategies succeed because they systematically capture concentration. As winners grow, indices allocate more capital to them automatically. But the trade-off is subtle: you earn the index return, while extraordinary outperformance becomes statistically rare.
This tension between concentration and diversification frequently surfaces in ajay srinivasan news discussions on portfolio construction.
6. Ownership vs. Trading: Time Is the Edge
All of the above applies to long-term ownership. The story shifts when we look at short-term trading.
Research by Brad Barber and Terrance Odean shows that 80–90% of short-term traders lose money. Trading exhibits Bessembinder-like skew — but without the compounding safety net.
The conclusion is stark:
Without a demonstrable, repeatable edge, time works against traders and for owners.
Short-term trading can work — but only for a tiny minority operating with discipline, structure, and often institutional advantages.
Conclusion: Capture the Skew or Be Captured by It
Return concentration is not an anomaly — it is a defining structural feature of equity markets.
For readers of ajay srinivasan news and long-term investment commentary, the lesson is consistent:
Other than for the rare exceptional stock pickers, history suggests a robust default strategy —
Own the index. Let time and concentration work in your favor
In a world where a handful of companies create most wealth, the real question is simple:
Will you identify the winners early —
or will you ensure you at least own them when they emerge?**
Read More – Ajay Srinivasan on Human Patterns: Infinite Stories, Shared Design
Ajay Srinivasan 
Leave a comment